Humanities

  Share

The newly acquired Vogue Archive by Proquest contains the entire run of Vogue magazine (US edition) from 1892 to the present, reproduced in high-resolution color page images. Vogue is a unique record of US and international popular culture that extends beyond fashion.

In addition to full text searching, you can browse entire issues from cover to cover. The Advanced Search mode allows searching by categories such as "Company/brand," "Fashion item," "Photographer/illustrator," "Person pictured" and "Contributor." You can also limit searches to specific article types such as feature articles, advertisements, fashion shoots, etc.

  Share

Listen to a discussion that Astrid M. Eckert, Associate Professor of History, had with Marshall Poe of New Books in History about her new book, The Struggle for the Files: The Western Allies and the Return of German Archives after the Second World War.

At the end of World War II the Western Allies confiscated all the German archives they could locate and moved them out of the country. It would be almost a decade before the Federal Republic of Germany was able to bring these archives home. Astrid M. Eckert, Associate Professor of History at Emory University, describes the fascinating story of the confiscation and return of German archives in her new book The Struggle for the Files: The Western Allies and the Return of German Archives after the Second World War (Cambridge University Press, 2012). Marshall Poe interviewed Professor Eckert about her book for the webcast New Books in History. Click here to listen to the interview.

Piranesi's Campus Martius

  Share

Emory’s MARBL has been collecting items for our ‘Views of Rome’ collection for over a decade, and we are pleased to announce the latest acquisition:

PIRANESI, Giovanni Batista. Campus Martius Antiquae Urbis. Rome, 1762. Elephant folio [53 x 41 cm]

Giovanni Piranesi (1720-1778) was an Italian etcher, engraver, designer, architect, archaeologist and theorist.  Emory’s copy is a first edition of Piranesi’s reconstruction of the Campus Martius, an important urban environment outside the walls of Rome. He based the work on 

• analysis of the surviving remains of the Campus Martius
• documents and inscriptions
• study of the fragmentary Severan Marble Plan of Rome.  

The reconstruction of the Campus Martius was, at the time, a subject of fierce controversy among Roman antiquarians.  And of course, in the Greco-Roman argument, Piranesi was always a fervent protagonist of Rome!

The contents of the work are well described by Martha Pollack in her entry for the Millard collection [Pollack, M, Washington, D.C.:1993, p. 312).

“The publication borrows from the two main interests of the author, the archaeological research and the polemical battles of the early 1760’s. His historical inquiry is here committed to supporting his view of the primacy of Roman builders.  [The] plan is one of Piranesi’s most feverish fantasies, marshaling a huge range of imaginary constructs for the celebration of ancient Rome. Within this plan he proposes an urban and architectural landscape of the utmost complexity. Piranesi achieves this tour de force through a great variety of illustrations and employs every means of representation at his disposal.”

A highlight of this work is one of Piranesi’s most ambitious cartographic efforts: a 6 sheet reconstruction of the Campus Martius measuring some 1.35 x 1.17 meters when assembled, and showing the influence of the 1748 Nolli plan on which Piranesi had collaborated.

The present copy is extra-illustrated with a rare entirely engraved broadsheet catalogue of Piranesi’s works up to the time of publication. Andrew Robison of the National Gallery has identified no less than 31 states from copies, of which the present is number 5, matching exactly a copy at the Art Institute of Chicago.

In addition, Piranesi dedicated this work to the Scottish architect Robert Adam (1754-98), who had been closely involved in its preparation during the later 1750s. Adam’s name features prominently on the title page where Piranesi also proudly flaunts his own membership of the Royal Society of London.  A medallion on the right of the large folding plate shows the two friends in profile.

For those interested in other items from Emory’s Views of Rome collection, please see the digital scholarship DiSC project based on Ligorio map of Ancient Rome.

MARBL thanks Emory's Michael C. Carlos Museum for their contribution to help acquire this important new addition to the Views of Rome collection.  Images courtesy of Seth Fagen from Martayan Lan Antique Maps and Rare Books.

  Share

Beck Center Grad Fellow Sara Palmer tells us how MALLET works and what you can (and cannot) do with Topic Modeling

This past summer I have enjoyed working with a tool called MALLET (MAchine Learning for LanguagE Toolkit) that can generate a series of potential topics in a corpus of texts.  Created by Andrew McCallum at University of Massachussetts, it is an open source toolkit and that is fairly easy to download and install.  While the setup instructions on the website are minimal, Shawn Graham’s has written a helpful overview of how to get started.  

Topic modeling is based on the idea that within a set of related texts, certain words will occur near each other with statistically significant frequency. MALLET works on documents like its acronymic namesake by shattering texts into an array of words.  It then applies a statistical method called Latent Dirichlet Allocation to put related words into clusters. 

These related groups of words, or ‘word bags’ as they are often called, can be interpreted as making up a topic.  For example, the group of words ‘needle,’ ‘stitching,’ and ‘fabric’ could reasonably be labeled as the topic ‘sewing.’  Of course, scholars familiar with a corpus can readily name a list of topics but what if you’re working with a large set of texts and don’t have time to read all of them carefully?  MALLET allows you to quickly obtain a general idea of what topics may be present.  

Perhaps the most prominent example of topic modeling with MALLET is Cameron Blevins’s work on the diary of Martha Ballard, an American midwife who wrote daily entries for 27 years.  Blevins’s topic model identified key themes in the diary such as ‘death,’ ‘shopping’ and ‘gardening’ and graphed their prominence over the course of Ballard’s life.  These charts often corresponded with known biographical details.  For example, the topic ‘emotion’ peaked between 1803 and 1804 when her husband was imprisoned for debt and her son was indicted for fraud.   

The field of DH itself has also been put under the MALLET “macroscope.”  Elijah Meeks’s work visualizes the network of associated ideas in the self-definitions of digital humanists while Matt Jockers analyzes the work performed in the field by culling themes from the blog posts of 117 digital humanists on a single day (March 18, 2010).  The Maryland Institute of Technology in the Humanities (MITH) has an excellent overview of how topic modeling has been used in the humanities.  Other prominent topic modeling projects featured on the MITH blog include Travis Brown’s work on Austen and Byron and Jeff Drouin’s work on Proust. 

Interest in topic modeling has grown at DiSC since it hosted a talk by Robert Nelson from the University of Richmond this past January.  In his research on the American Civil War, Nelson ran MALLET on the issues of Richmond Daily Dispatch newspaper from 1860-1865.  He was able to graph and contextualize topics such as fugitive slave ads and military recruitment, the results of which are illustrated beautifully on the project’s website.  For each topic Nelson has a separate page displaying the graphs of its prevalence over time, the most prominent key words, as well as the articles, ranked by compositional percentage, that most clearly exemplify the topic.  

These two components, keywords and compositional percentage, can be respectively derived from the MALLET output files ‘topic-keys’ and ‘doc-topics.’  At the Beck Center we wanted to see how this output might be used for understanding the journal Southern Changes, published monthly by the Atlanta-based Southern Regional Council from 1979 through 2003.  Comprised of 110 issues containing 978 articles, it is considerably smaller than the data set Nelson worked with but still large enough to make it a good fit for MALLET’s method.  We hoped to identify key terms with which to catalogue the collection and also to generate topical groups of articles that could be featured on the website.  The results were encouraging as I found the themes suggested by the topic keyword lists to roughly correspond with the subjects provided by Allen Tullos, editor of Southern Changes from 1982 through 2003.  Tullos writes:

 “The articles in Southern Changes range across many subjects: racial justice and the freedom struggle, voting rights, educational opportunity, economic democracy, social equality and inclusion, women's rights, environmental justice, critical regional studies, regional-global issues, and popular culture.”

After discovering a ten-topic run of MALLET to be a bit broad, I opted for 20 topics.  In THIS TABLE I have labeled the topic keyword lists with my overall impressions in black.  The generally correspondent Tullos subjects—labeled in green—are included for most of the MALLET topics.  This is, of course, a very rough sketch but it does appear to suggest correlation between MALLET data and expert knowledge.

As a model built on sampling and probability, MALLET naturally does not generate the same exact output each time it is run.  The topics and keywords do vary but are generally similar from one run to the next.  Below is a table comparing the keywords from the ‘Voting Rights’ topic in the previous example to those produced in five additional runs.  The original run was based on 10,000 iterations but for the sake of time, I used 1,000 iterations on the additional trials.  VIEW THOSE RESULTS HERE

While the topic-keys outline the word composition of the topics, the doc-topics indicates the topic composition of each document.  It simply lists, in descending order, the ID number of each topic and the percentage of the document that it makes up.  CLICK HERE for a table of the documents in which ‘Voting Rights’ comprises over 40% of the composition.

From this one can get a clearer picture of what kind of content is picked up by MALLET for the ‘Voting Rights’ topic and see that the topic is most prevalent in the journal around the 1980 and 2000 election cycles. 

In sum, MALLET did what we wanted it to do: we obtained key terms and a general overview of topics present.  My own attempts to graph the topics over time did not illustrate trends with nearly as much clarity as I would have hoped.  However, my objective is not to prove that MALLET is some kind of magic bullet, ripping through a corpus to the heart of its intelligibility.  Rather, I found that the output, when interpreted cautiously, can offer an excellent starting point for more detailed content analysis.