Submitted on Tue, 2009-12-15 at 11:13 am
Tags:
Not for academic credit maybe but can't beat the reach. In an article posted 12/2/09 in the UK internet directory Intute, a Ph.D. talks about the pro's and con's of contributing to Wikipedia. In brief, "WP is for summaries of published material, not for original research, I cannot include my critical reflections on the sources I use. That can be a difficult adjustment when you are used to academic writing, but balanced against that is the prospect of reaching a huge readership...."
In the Blog
- Summer Reading EBooks and AudioBooks
- The Extraordinary World of MARBL: Charles H. Herty Turpentine Cup
- Postcolonial Studies @ Emory
- A Beautifully Illustrated Book in the Seydel Collection
- The Extraordinary World of MARBL: Medical Formulas from the Reed Family
- New tech e-books:Safari Books Online
- The Extraordinary World of MARBL: Resurrection City Street Signs
- The Extraordinary World of MARBL: Ralph McGill's Paper Bag Letter
- Sisyphus: Patron Saint of the Stacks
- Cake Sprinkles, Cigarettes, Pasta, and Rusty Razor Blades: Preservation Challenges in MARBL
